Legal Opinion

Lillis v. AT & T CORP.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 22, 2006No. C.A. 717-NPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAMB, Vice Chancellor.

This case arises from a dispute between former officers and directors of a telecommunications company and that company’s successors in interest concerning the enforcement of contracts granting stock options. The plaintiffs have moved for judgment on the pleadings on Count IV of their complaint, seeking the attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in bringing their case under a contractual provision that authorizes such payments for certain claims. The question in this case specifically is the extent to which a contractual provision which provides for attorneys’ fees…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. McMillan v. Intercargo Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
  4. Lillis v. AT&T CORP.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2005

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. At&T CORP. v. LillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. David L. Banks v. Mackie H. BanksCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
  3. Trombley v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2009
  4. AM General Holdings LLC v. The Renco Group, Inc. and The Renco Group, Inc. v. MacAndrews AMG Holdings LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
  5. Aveanna Healthcare, LLC v. Epic/Freedom, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API