Legal Opinion

At&T CORP. v. Lillis

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 22, 2008No. 490, 2007, 459, 2007PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellees, who are former directors and officers of MediaOne Corp., seek compensation for stock options 1 that were cashed out in a 2004 merger between AT & T Wireless and Cingular. Me-diaOne originally granted its directors and officers options under a 1994 stock option plan. An anti-destruction, anti-dilution clause in that 1994 stock option plan preserved the option holders’ “economic position” upon the happening of certain specified events, including a merger.

AT & T acquired MediaOne in a stock for stock merger in 1999. In that merger,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. American Legacy FoundationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. 188 LLC v. Trinity Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Appriva Shareholder Litigation Co. v. Ev3, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  5. Northwestern National Insurance v. Esmark, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Kuhn Construction, Inc. v. Diamond State Port Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. Life Plans Incorporated v. Security Life of Denver InsuraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Norton v. K-Sea Transportation Partners L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  4. Allen v. Encore Energy Partners, L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  5. Airgas, Inc. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API