Legal Opinion

Morris v. Beebe & Henshaw

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1875PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. James Q. Smith. This was a real action in the nature of ejectment, brought by Josiab Morris, on May 4th, 1872, against A. Gerald, F. Tyler, Eugene Beebe and Ferrie Henshaw, to recover possession of certain premises in the city of Montgomery, known as the “ Montgomery Stables,” together with damages for their detention.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. James Q. Smith. This was a real action in the nature of ejectment, brought by Josiab Morris, on May 4th, 1872, against A. Gerald, F. Tyler, Eugene Beebe and Ferrie Henshaw, to recover possession of certain premises in the city of Montgomery, known as the “ Montgomery Stables,” together with damages for their detention. The first count of the complaint is in the exact language of the form for such action, prescribed in the Bevised Code. The second count differed from the first only in this: It averred that one May was possessed of the…

1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.

These are cross appeals, and were argued and submitted together. The only question presented on the appeal’of Morris v. Beebe & Henshaw, which we will first consider, is, whether the statutory real action can be maintained against landlord and tenant jointly, or whether the tenant in possession is not the only proper party defendant.

The Code abolishes all common law forms of action.—Ivey v. Blum, 53 Ala. It prescribes a system of remedies bearing more or less analogy to the remedies furnished by the common law. In the application of these remedies, we must look for common law principles and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chirac v. ReinickerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Spoor v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  3. Rowland v. Ladiga's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  4. Prignon v. DaussatWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Wharton v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Otis v. McMillan & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Merchants' Planters' Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Mountain Park Stock Farm Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Mann v. DoerrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Jones v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API