Legal Opinion

Prignon v. Daussat

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1892No. 384PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Skagit County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J. —

This action was brought by appellant to set aside a deed made by the respondent, L. P. Daussat, to the other respondent. It is conceded that the grantee had no knowledge that the grantor was indebted to anyone until long after the execution and recording of the deed, and that the deed in her hands, if otherwise supported, cannot be affected by anyfraudulent intent which may have moved *200the grantor to the making of the same. Appellant, how' ever, attacks the deed upon two grounds: First, that it was never delivered to the grantee; and, second,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  2. Morris v. Beebe & HenshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  3. In Re McClaskeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  4. In re the Estate of WadsworthNew York Surrogate's Court · 1917
  5. Salt v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API