Legal Opinion

Wharton v. Clay

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 3, 1815PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*167OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Owsley.

This Writ of error is brought to reverie a judgment taken in an action of ejectment against Roc, the casual ejector, by default.

By the assignment of errors, two questions are presented for the consideration of this court:

1st. With respect to the sufficiency of the evidence of the service of the declaration, &c.

2d. As to the necessity of serving the tenants in possession with a copy »f the common order, before a con- | firmation thereof.

The affidavit of service contains no suggestion that those upon whom service was made were tenants in possession of the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Western Life Indemnity Co. of Ill. v. RuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Brumleve v. CronanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Chesapeake, Ohio & Southwestern Railroad v. Heath's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  4. Morris v. Beebe & HenshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  5. Louisville & N. R. R. v. S. D. Chestnut & Bro.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API