Deitel v. La Minuette Trading Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This is the ordinary suit for patent infringement. The parties submitted to the District Judge a specimen of the defendants’ device alleged in the complaint to infringe the patent, and stipulated that such device might be used ón a motion to dismiss the bill. The motion to dismiss was made on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to entitle the complainants to any relief because defendants’ device did not come within the scope of the patent. The motion was made upon the bill as amplified by the defendants’ commercial device and the court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Western Electric Co. v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. GreenawaltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- International Mausoleum Co. v. SievertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Reinharts, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Lee v. State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Rubinstein v. Silex Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Braren v. HornerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Sharp v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.