Legal Opinion

Bush v. Rust-Oleum Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 5, 2024No. 3:20-cv-03268Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 ANTHONY BUSH, Case No. 20-cv-03268-LB 12 Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING 13 v. MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION, Re: ECF No. 95 15 Defendant. 16 17 INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT 18 This is a consumer-products mislabeling case. On behalf of a putative class of California 19 consumers, the plaintiff challenges defendant Rust-Oleum’s labeling of its “Krud Kutter” cleaning 20 products as “non-toxic” and “Earth friendly,” contending that the products in fact can cause…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API