Legal Opinion

Muhlhause v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1909No. 4159PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of seduction, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The facts disclose that the prosecutrix, Louise Gaskamp, was twenty-three years of. age in 1907. Appellant was something like six years her junior. Under her testimony she and appellant became engaged sometime prior to the time she testifies to the first act of sexual intercourse between them, which occurred in September, 1906. That after this engagement he continued going with her both before and subsequent to the act of intercourse. She says he went with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mrous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  2. Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Norton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Blain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  5. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Klepper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Humphrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Landers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API