Legal Opinion
Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 24, 1981No. 78 C 681PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
On December 31, 1980, following an extended bench trial, this Court entered its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, ruling in favor of Ingersoll Milling Machine Company (“Ingersoll”) on both its $33,400 claim against Otis Elevator Company (“Otis”) and Otis’ approximately $2.4 million counterclaim (which was of course the major reason for the hard-fought nature of the suit). Another dispute has erupted over Ingersoll’s bill of costs. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, Otis’ objections to the bill of costs are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Marrian Kolesar and Andrew Kolesar, Her HusbandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw Feeders, Inc., and Cross-Appellees v. Carrier Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Eddie Adams v. Norman CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Wh Smith Hotel Services, Inc. v. Wendy's International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Dopp v. HTP Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1991
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Oetiker v. Jurid Werke, GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.