Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NORDBERG, District Judge.
On January 31, 1986, this court, in a lengthy opinion, rendered a judgment in favor of defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) on all claims at issue in the trial of this case, and dismissed the claims of plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) regarding pregnancy-based discrimination with prejudice. EEOC v. Sears, 628 F.Supp. 1264 (N.D.Ill.1986). This matter is now before the court on Sears’ motion for costs and attorneys’ *620fees. For the reasons stated below, the court grants Sears’ motion for costs to the extent set…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Carol Majeske v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company v. Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company and Procter & Gamble Distributing Company, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants v. Commercial Union Insurance Company and American Employers Insurance Company, CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
- American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio (Afscme) v. Nassau CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Sandoval v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.