Legal Opinion

Drawdy v. Town of Port Royal

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 1992No. 23666PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

Appellant Town of Port Royal appeals the finding of the Master-in-Equity that Respondent Bruce A. Drawdy is entitled to a judgement for salary and associated benefits in the amount of $105,413.66 for a period during which he determined the respondent had been wrongfully excluded from his position. We affirm.

Respondent was employed as City Manager of Port Royal. *464On June 17, 1988, the Mayor informed him that the Town Council had voted unanimously to terminate respondent’s employment. On June 22, 1988, respondent requested a public hearing pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 5-13-70…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Missouri State Training School for BoysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. De Marco v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen CountySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Small v. Springs Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. In the Matter of FergusonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Smith v. City of MinerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Baber v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API