Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Miner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1988No. 53643PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly applied the rule of *260avoidable consequences as a limitation in awarding damages to plaintiff. Plaintiff-employee, Travis Smith, sued defendant, a fourth class city, for unpaid wages. Plaintiff contends he was entitled to wages for a period of thirty-four months, which includes all the period between May 1, 1984 and the date of trial in March, 1987. The trial court found that plaintiff was an appointed officer; was never lawfully discharged; and, was entitled to recover unpaid wages. However, the court also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Wolf v. Missouri State Training School for BoysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. Braun v. LorenzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Pumphrey v. City of LutesvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Rockport Shrimp Cooperative v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  3. Drawdy v. Town of Port RoyalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Aaron v. JohnstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Larry A. Bedford and Carol A. Bedford, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Audrain County Motor Company, Inc., d/b/a Auffenberg Motor Company of Mexico, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API