Hein v. Morgan
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ebexrhard-t, Judge.
1. The rulings• on demurrer. The defendant could not admit all of the allegations of this petition and escape liability. The general demurrer was properly overruled. Douglas, Augusta &c. R. Co. v. Swindle, 2 Ga. App. 550 (1) (59 SE 600). This we hold though at the conclusion of the evidence plaintiff abandoned the allegation that defendant’s car was being operated in excess of 60 miles per hour, there having been no proof of it, and defendant thereupon renewed his demurrers.
It is true that “the mere fact that one vehicle is struck in its rear, while another is not struck,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co. v. SwindleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Flanigan v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Hay v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Holland v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Lang v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Jones v. SpindelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Robertson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971