Legal Opinion

Holland v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1908No. 852PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Action for damages, from city court of Statesboro — Judge Brannen. September 20, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

This was a suit for damages on account of an assault and battery. The jury gave the plaintiff a small verdict. He moved for a new trial on the general grounds, and also for certain errors in the charge. The judge granted a new trial; and the defendant excepts. As the grounds of the motion for a new trial assigning errors of law are not meritorious, we conclude that the-grant was upon the general grounds. The defendant, being satisfied with the amount found against him, questions the discretion of the trial judge to interfere with the finding of the jury in assessing damages.

Section 3803 of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. PerkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Lang v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  4. Adkins v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. MiillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hospital Authority v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. Realty Bond & Mortgage Co. v. HarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Hotel Equipment Co. v. LiddellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Candler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Evans v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API