Robertson v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
Rear-end collisions are no exception to the rule of law that there is no absolute duty upon the following driver to avoid a collision, so that where no more appears than that there has been such a collision, with no facts proven from which an inference of negligence can be drawn, the plaintiff has failed to carry the burden of proof. Hay v. Carter, 94 Ga. App. 382 (94 SE2d 755), and, as to applicable jury instructions, see Flanigan v. Reville, 107 Ga. App. 382 (130 SE2d 258) and Davenport v. Robinson, 109 Ga. App. 753 (137 SE2d 380). Under fact situations where either the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Malcom v. MalcolmCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Flanigan v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Hay v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Cartey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. NutterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Cagle v. AtchleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Cagle v. AMEAGLE CONTRACTORS, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Glover v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Glover v. SOU. BELL T. & T. CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.