Raishbrook v. Estate of Bayley
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Because the record on appeal contains neither a transcript nor any statement of the evidence adduced in the court below, which we deem essential to determination of contentions presented to us, the order appealed from is affirmed. When evidence on which a district court’s judgment rests is not properly included in the record on appeal, it is assumed that the record supports the lower court’s findings. NRAP 10; City of Las Vegas v. Bolden, 89 Nev. 526, 516 P.2d 110 (1973); Meakin v. Meakin, 88 Nev. 25, 492 P.2d 1304 (1972); Leeming v. Leeming, 87 Nev. 530, 490 P.2d 342 (1971); Pfister…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Pfister v. SheltonNevada Supreme Court · 1952
- Leeming v. LeemingNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Las Vegas v. BoldenNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Meakin v. MeakinNevada Supreme Court · 1972
4Cited by7 opinions
- Pan v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Pan v. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- City Plan Development, Inc. v. Office of the Labor CommissionerNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Webb v. ShullNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Borgerson v. ScanlonNevada Supreme Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.