Legal Opinion

Leeming v. Leeming

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1971No. 6491PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, J.:

On this appeal, we affirm the district court’s refusal to apply NRCP 68 to post-judgment proceedings in a divorce matter.

Several years after their divorce, respondent moved the court to order appellant to increase payments for the support of the parties’ minor children. Predicated not upon rights inhering in respondent, but upon the children’s claimed needs, respondent’s motion invoked power reserved to the court under NRS 125.140(2), which provides: “In actions for divorce the court may, during the pendency of the action, or at the final hearing or at any…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State Ex Rel. Groves v. First Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of OrmsbyNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Fenkell v. FenkellNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Atkins v. AtkinsNevada Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Lake v. LakeNevada Supreme Court · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Love v. LoveNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ellett v. EllettNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of Las Vegas v. BoldenNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Meakin v. MeakinNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Raishbrook v. Estate of BayleyNevada Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API