Legal Opinion
Hill v. Hill
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided April 13, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions
On bill, &c.
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, V. C.
This litigation was initiated by a bill filed by the complainants as executors of the estate of Thomas Hill, deceased, for instructions regarding the payment of a bond' made by the testator during his lifetime to the Pfovident Institution for Sayings in Jersey City for $10,000 to secure which he gave a mortgage upon the property on Newark avenue, in Jersejr Oityr, devised by him in his will to Grace Louise Hill, as trustee.
As appears from the agreed state of facts all the allegations in the bill are admitted by the defendants Ernest Perry Hill and Arthur Edward Hill, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lowell v. DoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Crowder v. Fletcher & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
3Cited by6 opinions
- GUTTENBERG S. & L. ASS'N, CORP. v. RiveraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- State Bd. Milk Control v. Richman, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Caparell v. GoodbodyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Campbell v. CampbellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Torbyn v. South River Sand Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.