United States v. E. Lavay McKinley
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
Mr. McKinley, facing criminal prosecution in Wyoming, undertook counter-measures that were (and are) apparently unprecedented in the annals of traditional criminal law. Mr. McKinley filed with the County Clerk of Laramie County, Wyoming, a self-styled “Commercial Just Compensation Customer’s Lien” purporting to encumber the property of Mr. Richard Stacy and the Honorable Clarence Brimmer, respectively the prosecuting U.S. Attorney and the presiding judge in his criminal case. While it is a task of no slight difficulty to draw from these documents a cognizable legal basis…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Martinez v. WinnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Van Sickle v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Hunt v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Monroe v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. E. Lavay McKinleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. C.R. Gurule, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Bundy v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- United States v. BarkerDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.