Legal Opinion · Dissent

Guilford v. Spartan Food Systems, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1979No. 78-162Published

1Dissent

I respectfully dissent. Were I able to conclude, as does the majority, that there is an appealable judgment extant in this case, I would also affirm. I cannot, hence this dissent.

This is an attempt upon the part of William D. Guilford, d/b/a Clara-Gene Painting Company, to appeal from an order granting a Rule 12 (b)(6) motion to dismiss his amended complaint. The order allowed Guilford ten days to further amend his complaint, which he failed to do. There was no motion by defendants Spartan Food Systems, Inc. and William Linder, Jr., to dismiss the action under the provisions of Rule 41 (b)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jung v. K. & D. Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. The City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  3. Cooper v. City of FairhopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Buchanon v. City Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Bass v. City of EnterpriseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API