Legal Opinion
Jung v. K. & D. Mining Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 28, 1958No. 619PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioners seek our writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing their appeal as untimely.
The facts are undisputed. Petitioners brought this action to recover the purchase price of securities alleged to have been worthless and fraudulently sold to them by respondents in violation of § 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (48 Stat. 84, 15 U. S. C. § 771), and of § 10 (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (48 Stat. 891, 15 U. S. C. § 78j (b)), Respondents moved to dismiss petitioners’ first amended complaint for failure to state a claim…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Crutcher v. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Missouri & Kansas Interurban Railway Co. v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Western Electric Co. v. Pacent Reproducer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Clark v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Amy Weber v. Frances McGroganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- JoAnn Britt v. Louis DeJoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- WMX Technologies, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.