Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. The City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant-plaintiff sued to quiet title to land in Oklahoma and asserted federal jurisdiction on the ground that the controversy arose under the laws and treaties of the United States, specifically the so-called “Enid and Anadarko Act.” 1 The appellee-defendant moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. At a hearing on the motion the appellant-plaintiff sought to amend its complaint.
The appeal must be dismissed because the record contains no appealable order. At the conclusion of the hearing the court denied leave to amend and ruled that the court had no jurisdiction. Thereafter, a deputy…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crutcher v. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Wyoming Construction Company v. Western Casualty And Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Julia M. Martinez v. Joseph Flores and Angela FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by20 opinions
- Arthur Butler, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Stover Brothers Trucking Company, a Corporation, and William D. Paulson, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Garver v. Public Service Company of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Great American Insurance Company v. Louis Lesser Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Michael Korgich v. Regents of the New Mexico School of Mines, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Guilford v. Spartan Food Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.