Legal Opinion

Brideau v. Grissom

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1963No. Calendar 65, Docket 49,142PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

Plaintiffs are the owners and occupants of 2 homes and lots on State Park avenue, a residential street in the city of Center Line. Defendant is the owner and occupant of business lots in the subdivision fronting on Van Dyke at the corner of State Park avenue, along with 3 lots on State Park avenue immediately adjacent to and in the rear of the business lots on Van Dyke.

Plaintiffs sought to enjoin defendant from violating the building or use restrictions contained in the deed covering the lots in the subdivision. Plantiifs claim the 3 lots of defendant — lots 279, 280, and 281 —are restricted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sandenburgh v. Michigamme Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Phillips v. LawlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Farley v. FinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Harrigan v. MulcareMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Scott v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Hawthorne v. Realty Syndicate, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Callahan v. WeilandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. Rofe v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Neal v. Grapetree Bay Hotels, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API