Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Gee
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1967No. 10590PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROFT, District Judge:
This action was commenced by appellants to enjoin the further use by respondents of their respective residences as two-family dwellings, which, it is alleged, were built and used as such by respondents in violation' of restrictive covenants of record relating to the established subdivision in which they live. From a judgment dismissing their complaint as stating no cause of action, plaintiffs appealed.
*341The appellants, 21 in number, are the individual owners of residential lots in Indian Rock Subdivision, a first-class residential area located in the vicinity of Wasatch…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jones v. Park Lane for Convalescents, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Hooker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Neptune Park Assn. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Seeley v. Phi Sigma Delta House Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Collins v. GoetschHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Dansie v. Hi-Country Estates Homeowners AssociationUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Holladay Duplex Management Co. v. HowellsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.