Legal Opinion

Sanford v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 1983No. Claim No. 60561; Claim No. 59495PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeals from judgments in favor of claimants, entered February *8585,1982, upon a decision of the Court of Claims (O’Shea, J.). Following years of planning begun in the early nineteen fifties and continuing into the sixties and the enactment of appropriate legislation, section 349-e of article 12-B of the Highway Law, construction of the Amsterdam Arterial Highway was commenced in the mid-sixties by the State. This portion of the system included a one-way northbound thousand-foot span over Chúctanunda Creek connecting Market Street and Church Street and linking the city’s most densely populated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Tomassi v. Town of UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Eastman v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Nuss v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Roberts v. Town of ColchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. O'Connor v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Cruz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Hamilton v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API