Ingram v. Heintz
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Twenty-Sixth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany; Ered D. King, Judge. Action by Margaret Ingram against Charles Heintz and Emma Heintz. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
NICHOLLS, C. J.
The plaintiff alleged that she and her brother, George Ingram, are the sole heirs and descendants of George Ingram and Catherine A. Wilkinson, his wife, both deceased intestate.
That at the time of his death George Ingram owned certain property in the parish of St. Tammany, containing 450 acres, more or less, which she described. That said property was acquired by George Ingram, father of petitioner, from Nathan Page, by act before A. Bosque, recorder of the parish of St. Tammany, August 10, 1875, but, for purpose of convenience, the title thereto was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- West v. NegrottoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Davis v. JelksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
- Suthon v. CastilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
3Cited by4 opinions
- Monkhouse v. JohnsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Johnston v. LooseMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Babin's Heirs v. DaspitSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Dougherty v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley RailroadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928