Dougherty v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1ConcurrenceLeche, J.
The facts in this case were stated in the original opinion but it is not amiss to restate some of them, insofar as they have a pertinent bearing upon the issues involved. It is also proper that the pleadings be likewise adverted to for the same reason.
Plaintiffs in their petition, do not allege that they were the owners of the barn when it was destroyed by fire, but they do pray for judgment against the Y. & M. V. R. R. Co., for the full value of the barn, for themselves in part, and for the insurance company for the balance, as beneficiary and subrogee.
The only reasonable theory applicable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hanton v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Reisz v. Kansas City Southern R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- West v. NegrottoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Cusachs v. DugueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Succession of KeppelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.