Franse v. Armbuster
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Cuming county. Tried below before Wakeley, J. cited: AtJcins v. Atkins, 9 Neb., 191 ' Frazer v. Miles, 10 Id., 113; Murphy v. Lyons, 19 Id., 689. cited: Miller v. Myers, 11 Neb., 474; McCreary v. Bratt, 9 Id., 122; Sullivan Sav. Inst. v. Clark, 12 Id., 578 ; Sandwich Mfg.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Cuming county. Tried below before Wakeley, J. cited: AtJcins v. Atkins, 9 Neb., 191 ' Frazer v. Miles, 10 Id., 113; Murphy v. Lyons, 19 Id., 689. cited: Miller v. Myers, 11 Neb., 474; McCreary v. Bratt, 9 Id., 122; Sullivan Sav. Inst. v. Clark, 12 Id., 578 ; Sandwich Mfg. Co. v. Shiley, 15 Id., 110; Gillespie v. Sawyer, Id., 536; State v. Graham, 21 Id., 355; Fulton v. Levy, Id., 478; Anderson v. Armstead, 69 111., 452; Foster v. Bettsworth, 37 la., 415; Eikenberry v. Edwards, 67 la., 14 [24 N. W. Rep., 570]; Pitcher v. Dove, 99 Ind., 175; Vaughn v. Sheridan,…
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action of ejectment brought by the plaintiff against the defendant in the district court of Cuming county to recover the possession of certain real estate. On the trial of the cause the court found the issues in favor of the defendant and dismissed the action.
The testimony tends to show that in March, 1878, one Robert B. Millar, the then owner of the land in controversy, gave a mortgage on said land to Aultman & Taylor Company, to secure the sum of $713.35 ; that default was' made in the payment of the amount secured by said mort*469gage, and in April, 1879, a decree of foreclosure and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Helmer v. RehmNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nolan v. SchaetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Woodhouse v. Nelson Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Bank of Horton v. KnoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Bayliss v. ClasonNebraska Court of Appeals · 2018
- St. Paul Harvester Co. v. MahsNebraska Supreme Court · 1908