Legal Opinion

Linn County Bank v. Davis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 12, 1921No. 23,249PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This case was before the court in Bank v. Davis, 103 Kan. 672, 175 Pac. 972. At that time it involved the construction of the bulk-sales law. The present appeal raises another question.

O. L. Davis gave a bill of sale on his stock of groceries to R. L. Glascock and placed the latter in possession. Immediately thereafter the Linn County Bank sued Davis on a promissory note, and caused a garnishment summons to be served upon Glascock who answered denying liability to Davis. The bank took issue on the garnishee’s answer upon the ground that in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Linn County Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. Rickman v. RickmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Barton v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Beamer v. WinterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. Montana National Bank v. Merchants National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fousek v. DeforestMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Standard Steel Works v. Crutcher-Rolfs-Cummings, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. Ellery v. CummingArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. First National Bank v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Anthony Wholesale Grocery Co. v. CloudSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API