Legal Opinion
Ellery v. Cumming
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1932No. Civil No. 3255PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
E. K. Cumming, hereinafter called plaintiff, recovered judgment in the superior court of Santa Cruz county against one H. J. Farmer for $527.30. On September 12th, 1931, and after such judgment, he had a writ of garnishment served upon the Sonora Bank & Trust Company, hereinafter called the bank, which answered denying any indebtedness to Farmer. The answer was controverted by plaintiff and an issue in garnishment duly formed. Before such issue could be heard, the bank became insolvent and its assets were taken over by S. W. Ellery, as superintendent of banks, hereinafter called defendant,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Woodhouse v. CrandallIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Focke, Wilkens & Lange & Scott v. Leon & BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Mutual Accident Ass'n of the Northwest v. JacobsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Mulcahey v. StraussIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- John M. C. Marble Co. v. Merchants' National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alberts v. Tuft (In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp.)District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Carpenter v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Universal Marketing & Entertainment, Inc. v. Bank One of Arizona, N.A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- O'LEARY v. Superior Court of Gila CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Carley v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.