Legal Opinion

Newman v. Bump

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1929No. Docket No. 90, Calendar No. 34,164PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff, as assignee of Page L. Carroll, filed a bill of complaint against defendants for an accounting, an abatement or reduction in the contract price of the lands involved for deficiency of title and warranty which defendants are unable to convey, specific performance, an injunction to restrain defendants from selling or disposing of any of the lands, in controversy, and from instituting suit to terminate plaintiff’s rights therein. Defendants filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill, denying the material allegations of the bill of complaint, alleging the failure of Carroll and of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lincoln v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State v. Venice of America Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. Lake St. Clair Fishing & Shooting ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API