Legal Opinion
Hansen & Rowland, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1934No. 7353PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff Hansen & Rowland, Inc., is a Washington corporation, with its principal office in Tacoma, Wash., and is engaged in a general insurance agency business. In October, 1919, the company, in addition to its principal office, operated a branch in Seattle, Wash., and also was interested in several subsidiary corporations in Tacoma.
On October 24, 1919', the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, executed and delivered to Hansen & Rowland, hereinafter referred to as the parent company, a “position form of fidelity…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Sales Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. National Surety Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Oklahoma Morris Plan Co. v. Security Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1970
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. HeynDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956