Legal Opinion
Wilkie v. Manhattan Rubber Mfg. Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 14, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BODINE, District Judge.
This is a suit for infringement of Burnham patent, No. 900,055, issued September 29, 1908, to the Stoughton Rubber Company, -as assignee of Burnham, for an improvement in squeeze rolls for wool-washing machinery.
The plaintiff, Robert J. Wilkie, acquired title to the patent by purchase from the Stoughton Rubber Company on June 15, 1922. Mr. Wilkie’s first connection with the patent began in 1909, when his company, the Wilkie Rubber Manufacturing Company, of Lynn, Mass., took a license under it. Mr. Wilkie is now connected with the Stowe & Woodward Company, of Newton,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Egbert v. LippmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Gillons v. Shell Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Wilkie v. Manhattan Rubber Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. Acme Card System Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1937
- Union Shipbuilding Co. v. Boston Iron & Metal Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.