Legal Opinion
State v. Kruelski
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 28, 1996No. 14813PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The state appeals from a judgment of acquittal1 on the charge of offering to make home improvements without being registered in violation of General Statutes § 20-427 (b) (5).2 Such a violation is designated a class B misdemeanor; General Statutes § 20-427 (c) (1); and carries a penalty of imprisonment for not more *478than one year. General Statutes § 53a-26. The state claims on appeal that (1) the issuance of the warrant for the arrest of the defendant and its service on the defendant, on the facts of this case, tolled the statute of limitations, and (2) a second trial of the defendant would…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Edward Kruelski, Jr. v. State of Connecticut Superior Court for the Judicial District of Danbury and Geographical Area 3 at DanburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- State v. SwebiliusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- State v. SoldiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. WoodtkeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. KruelskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.