Legal Opinion

State v. Woodtke

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 23, 2011No. AC 32487PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBINSON, J.

The defendant, Lama Woodtke, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following her conditional plea of nolo contendere, of criminal damage to a landlord’s property in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-117f. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied her motion to dismiss because her prosecution was time barred by the statute of limitation's set forth in General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 54-193. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EcholsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. State v. AliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. KruelskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. State v. SoldiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SwebiliusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. State v. CrosbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. State v. PughConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. Mercer v. BlanchetteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. State v. BrundageConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API