Legal Opinion

Magnuson v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 13, 2005No. A04-2212PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

In this appeal from the rescission of respondent’s license revocation, appellant commissioner of public safety argues that the court erred by concluding that (1) an investigatory stop based on an identified informant’s tip to the police was invalid and (2) the implied-consent advisory violated respondent’s due-process rights because it did not warn that a test result of .20 or more is an aggravating factor that might increase the penalty for driving while impaired. Because we find that the stop was lawful and that the implied-consent advisory did not violate respondent’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KlamarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Tyler Lee Johnson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Amy Lynn-Ishwar Butani v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Gerald John Westman v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Ian Jorgen Crocker v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API