Legal Opinion

In Re Bowman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1995PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE

FLAHERTY, Justice.

I would affirm the Superior Court. Although the record demonstrates appellee is far from a good parent, appellee’s conduct does not constitute quite the requisite clear, direct, weighty and convincing evidence which shows a settled purpose of relinquishment of parental claim for at least six months prior to the filing of the petition, and it is not clear that termination would serve the best interests of the children. In my view, an appellate court is somewhat more than a rubber stamp in cases of this sort. Here Superior Court took note of the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re William L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. In Re Adoption of McCraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. In Re Adoption of AtencioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Matter of Adoption of David C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of Charles EDM, IISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. In the Interest of C.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. In re B.L.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. In Re: Adopt. of M.R.D. and T.M.D. Appeal of: M.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. In Re Julissa O.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API