Legal Opinion
EW Bliss Company v. Cold Metal Process Company
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 2, 1959No. Equity 5402; Civ. A. 24189, 26542, 31849PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, District Judge.
The Consolidated Cases.
These four actions were consolidated for trial.
They involve the validity, scope and infringement of three patents for improved mills and methods for the rolling of hot and cold metal in strip or sheet form.
The patents in suit are: No. 1,744,-016 (’016) issued January 14, 1930 on an application filed June 30, 1923 by Abram P. Steckel, hereinafter referred to as Steckel; No. 1,779,195 (’195) issued October 21, 1930 on an application filed December 9, 1929, as a division of the original Steckel application; No. 2,706-original Steckel application; No.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. AnayaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Meese v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- National Board of YWCA v. YWCA OF CHARLESTON, SCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
- Benger Laboratories Ltd. v. R. K. Laros Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.