Legal Opinion
Gossett v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Board of Regents for Langston University
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 10, 2001No. 98-5084PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Marty Gossett brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a) (Title IX) against the Board of Regents of Langston University, and the University President and Dean of the University School of Nursing. Mr. Gossett alleged that his involuntary withdrawal from the University’s nursing program was caused by gender discrimination that violated his right to equal protection, substantive and procedural due process, and Title IX. The district court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ruling that Mr. Gossett had failed to present sufficient…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Rivera v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Norris v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Piercy v. MaketaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Doebele v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Hiatt v. Colorado SeminaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.