Legal Opinion

MacAluso v. United Engineers & Constructors

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1945No. Appeal, 162PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldbige, P. J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case the board susstained the referee’s award granting compensation to the claimant for total disability. The learned court below affirmed the board. This appeal by the employer followed.

The appellants claim that there was not sufficient, legally competent evidence to warrant the finding (1) that the claimant had sustained an accident in the course of his employment, (2) that he was totally disabled as a result thereof, and (3) if a disability did result from the accident, that it continued to the time of the hearings before the referee.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Gavula v. Sims Company.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Buck v. ArndtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dindino v. Weekly Review Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API