Qualls v. Rumsfeld
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the defendants’ Motion [44] to Dismiss. Upon consideration of the defendants’ motion, the opposition thereto, the reply brief, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court concludes that the defendants’ motion will be granted. The Court agrees with the defendants’ contention that plaintiffs have failed to state any claim upon which relief may be granted. Moreover, plaintiff Qualls’ challenge is mooted by the fact that Qualls voluntarily extended his period of service in the military.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jackson v. TateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Peek v. Clear Sky Financial, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024