Legal Opinion
United States v. David Carlton Arnold, Armando Coto
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 25, 1997No. 93-4713, 95-4649PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Chief Judge;
Appellants, David C. Arnold and Armando Coto, appeal their convictions and sentences arising from their participation in a drug conspiracy. Arnold and Coto were tried together before a jury and convicted on Count I for conspiracy to distribute marijuana. The jury also convicted Arnold on three counts of money laundering and two counts of interstate travel in aid of racketeering. Appellants contend that the statute of limitations barred their prosecution, and therefore conviction, on the conspiracy count. In addition, appellants contend that they are entitled to a new…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. George Terzado-MadrugaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. SeherCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- State v. YoungbloodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
- United States v. AngleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Mangual-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Howard William Harriston, Iii, A.K.A. Little Bill, A.K.A. Little Geek, A.K.A. Young Gun, A.K.A. Melvin JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.