Legal Opinion
United States v. Seher
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 26, 2009No. 07-13935, 07-14055 and 07-15919PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
Toros Seher, Chaplin’s, Inc. (“Chaplin’s”), and Chaplin’s Midtown, Inc. (“Midtown”) (collectively “the Appellants”) appeal their convictions and sentences for various offenses related to money laundering and federal transaction reporting requirements. After a jury trial, the Appellants were found guilty of money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(3)(B)-(C), and of failure to file Form 8300 for various transactions, in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5324(b)(1), (d)(2). Seher also was found guilty of conspiracy to launder money, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h).…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- United States v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Edgar Jamal GamoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Estate of Amergi Ex Rel. Amergi v. Palestinian AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Chris VernonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.