Camenisch v. Umpqua Bank
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SHELA CAMENISCH, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05905-PCP 8 Plaintiffs, OMNIBUS ORDER ON MOTIONS TO 9 v. EXCLUDE EXPERTS’ OPINIONS AND TESTIMONY AND MOTIONS IN 10 UMPQUA BANK, LIMINE 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 242, 243, 244, 245, 247 12 Before the Court are defendant Umpqua Bank’s motions to exclude the opinions and 13 testimony of plaintiffs’ experts Catherine Ghiglieri, Dan Salah, and Micheal Goldberg and both 14 parties’ motions in limine.1 For the reasons set forth herein, the parties’ motions in limine and 15 Umqpua’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.