Legal Opinion

Bac v. Blm

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2001No. C-00-7PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

[T1] This case requires that we determine whether procedures used by the district court commissioner and the district court satisfy constitutional and statutory requirements. We decide specifically whether the commissioner acted beyond his statutory authority when he did not allow Appellant BAC (Mother) to introduce certain evidence at the custody hearing. Having determined that the actions of the commissioner and the district court were violative of constitutional and statutory requirements, we reverse and remand.

ISSUE

[T2] Mother presents this statement of the issue:

Did…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Starke Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hall v. HallWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Huhn v. QuinnWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  4. May v. MayWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Foster v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bell v. SchellWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Timothy S. O'Roake v. State of Wyoming, ex rel. Department of Family Services, Child Support Enforcement Division and Regina G. RidgwayWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API