Legal Opinion

May v. May

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1997No. 96-251PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

Based upon the findings of a district court commissioner, the district court ordered a change of custody from appellant (Father) to appellee (Mother). Father challenges the commissioner’s authority on numerous grounds and also alleges improprieties in the district court proceedings. We remand for a ruling by the district court on the admissibility of evidence which the commissioner did not allow Father to present.

The issues pertinent to our decision can be summarized as follows:

1. Did the district court commissioner act within his authority?

a. Was the district court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stadtfeld v. StadtfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Huhn v. QuinnWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Foster v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cross v. Berg Lumber CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Fontaine v. Board of County Com'rs of Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Adoption of TLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Lee v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Stonham v. WidiastutiWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API