Persgard v. Gordon C. Carroll & Sons, Inc.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Gordon Carroll appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Carroll maintains that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to take into account prior to entering judgment the respective expenses of the parties in performing a contract, and by failing to allow the jury to determine those expenses. Respondent Persgard claims that Carroll’s service of the motion for new trial was not timely. We affirm.

FACTS

George Persgard and Gordon Carroll, both from the Duluth area, had been friends and occasional business associates for 25 years.

In 1976,…