Legal Opinion

Talvan v. Siegel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1992No. 91AP-1275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whiteside, Judge.

Plaintiffs, George and Dessie Talvan, appeal from an order of the Franklin County Common Pleas Court granting the motion of defendant Adam Marc Siegel to require the taking of the deposition of plaintiffs’ personal physician. In support of their appeal, plaintiffs have raised a single assignment of error as follows:

“The trial court erred in ordering the discovery deposition of appellants’ physician in the absence of a waiver of the physician/patient privilege.”

This cause arises from an automobile accident which occurred on May 18, 1987, in which both plaintiffs were injured.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Medical Board v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Humphry v. Riverside Methodist HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Doe v. University of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Lambdin v. BrentonOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Kennedy v. ChalfinOhio Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Cleveland Pneumatic Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Mason v. BookerOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Dineen v. PelfreyOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Gentile v. DuncanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API