Legal Opinion

United States v. Bene

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 28, 1916No. 1598PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 38167.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

This case involves the tariff classification of iron drums containing binoxide of barium, which were imported at the port of New York and assessed by the collector of customs as cylindrical or tubular tanks or vessels, dutiable at 20 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of that part of paragraph 127 of the tariff act of 1913 which reads as follows:

127. * * * Cylindrical or tubular tanks or vessels, for holding gas, liquids, or other material, whether full or empty; * * * 20 per centum ad valorem.

*524The importers claimed in their protest that the drums were the usual containers of merchandise…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MarxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. GarramoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. Braun Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. United States v. Murphy & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. Autoridad de Tierras de Puerto Rico v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Impact Container Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API