Legal Opinion
In re NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 16, 1997No. Nos. 94 Civ. 3996(RWS), MDL 1023PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this class action have moved for preliminary approval of proposed settlements with six different defendants, Sherwood Securities Corp., (“Sherwood”), Kidder Peabody & Co., (“Kidder”), Herzog, Heine, Geduld, Inc., (“Herzog”), Jeffries and Co., Inc., (“Jeffries”), Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., (“Cantor”), and Montgomery Securities, (“Montgomery”) (collectively, the “Settling Defendants”). Certain other defendants, (the “Non-Settling Defendants”),1 oppose the motion as regards Herzog, Jeffries, Cantor and Montgomery only. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Pepsico, Inc., Pepsico, Inc., Third-Party v. Banner Industries, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Heldman v. SobolCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Wilson v. Glenwood Intermountain Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Davis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Karvaly v. Ebay, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Horton v. Usaa Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Gates v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.